In the perspective of a crying Injured JAWAN pleading for medical help on National Television after Maoist Blast, Does the NATION have right to know using RTI whether SANCTIONED COMPENSATION is FULLY/PARTIALLY/ NOT given AT ALL to surviving family members of the JAWANS?????? Here is what our MOD thinks if AAM AADMI want to access historic data (related to SANCTIONED COMPENSATION to Security forces)!!!

Yes, its true! An RTI application (vide Regn No : MHOME/R/2013/61553 dt 28-10-2013)  was filed by a RTI activist celebrating the RTI Day on 25-10-2013.

1.     Here are the Particulars of Information sought from RTI :
Starting from KARGIL WAR till date, please provide number of CASUALTIES (during fighting with external enemy like Pakistan Army or terror strikes by Militants and internal insurgency like Maoist attack) and compensation paid (be it fully/partially or not at all) in all categories such as Army, BSF, CRPF as under in following sample format :

1.1  What are the number of Death occurred in all categories such as Army, BSF, CRPF?

1.2   What are the number of physically DIS-ABLED security personnel (who got injured during action) in all categories such as Army, BSF, CRPF?

1.3   What are the number of cases where SANCTIONED COMPENSATION is FULLY given to surviving family members?

1.4   What are the number of cases where SANCTIONED COMPENSATION is PARTIALLY given to surviving family members?

1.5   What are the number of cases where SANCTIONED COMPENSATION is NOT given AT ALL to surviving family members?

1.6   Provide List of security personnel and amount paid as partial compensation and reason behind such delay in full disbursement.

1.7   Provide List of security personnel and amount YET TO BE paid as full compensation and reason behind such delay in full disbursement.

In reply to above, Army(Letter No. A/810027/RTI/15034 dated 03-02-2014), BSF(Letter No. 2400/Ops/C-II/34/14/136-37 dated 05-02-2014), CRPF(Letter No. M-V-905/2013-Adm. I/RTI dt 27-01-2014) refused to provide (rejecting the 1st Appeal) the above data stating that Information sought is exempted from disclosure :

Ø  Under section 8(1) (a) of RTI act 2005.

Ø  RTI Act 2005 is not applicable for security forces under section 24(1) except information related to allegations of human rights violations/corruption.

Ø  Information/queries sought by you were general in nature and your application does not make any reference to such allegations. Hence this Dept. is not liable to provide such information to you.

Above refusal to provide data confirm following facts :

A)     AAM AADMI has no right to access data related to above queries (1.1 to 1.7) as there is neither any  reference to human rights violations NOR corruption!!!

B)      AAM AADMI has no right to access data related to their Jawan brothers who are dedicating their lives for the entire nation without any vested interest!!!
<Read Blog that elaborate on How SELF-CREATED and KEPT-ALIVE issues of India were resolved 45 Yrs back : http://rationale-jay.blogspot.in/2014/02/how-self-created-and-kept-alive-issues.html>

C)      AAM AADMI has no right to access data related to their Jawan brothers who are humiliated shamelessly by irresponsible Political Leaders for Vote Bank Politics!!!
<Read blog : http://rationale-jay.blogspot.in/2014/04/these-shameless-netas-can-humiliate-our.html >

Above all, is there a scope left to expose either human rights violations OR corruption if MOD does not reveal above data which is solely for the PURPOSE OF WELFARE OF OUR ARMED FORCES WHO DEDICATE THEIR LIFE every second day very much UNLIKE these SHAMELESS NETAs whose dedication to the nation starts and ends at “LIP SERVICE” only and that too maligning the ARMED FORCES just for coming back to power and LOOT the nations left open TIJORI as happening ever since Independence.

<How helpless we AAM AADMI are after electing our NETAs in LS/RS/VS: http://rationale-jay.blogspot.in/2013/08/how-helpless-we-aam-aadmi-are-after.html>

<AMAZING UNITY AND SOLIDARITY shown by all political parties ON ONE ISSUE: http://rationale-jay.blogspot.in/2013/07/issue-is-not-whether-aam-aadmi-can-have.html>